Author Archives: admin

Influence Equity and the Principle of Fruitfulness

Posted by | Category: Articles | Comments: 0 Comments


For many years now I have utilised the Influence Equity model as a foundation for my teaching. It is based on Aristotle’s insights around persuasion, as outlined in Rhetoric (350BC). Aristotle outlines three methods by which we can persuade others – through our character, through our ability to put others in a particular frame of mind, and through the logic or reasoning we present.

The impact becomes exponentially greater when all three are used together.

These three elements of persuasion remain as true today as they have ever been, and our relatively recent discoveries in the fields of neuroscience and neurolinguistic programming are providing the scientific evidence that underpin what Aristotle described some 2,500 years ago. Communication experts teach us how to project an image, how to build rapport and use language and logic that frames arguments in a manner in which the intended recipient can hear and believe what the sender intends.

Sadly, these elements can be used to manipulate and deceive just as easily as they can be used to persuade and influence, as we have again witnessed in recent weeks. We saw a leader whose apparent character elevated him to one of the most senior and influential levels of his organisation before he was undone by the revelation of a deep character flaw. We’ve seen the devastating impact of flawed logic and twisted oratory on the lives of so many innocent people in New Zealand. And we’ve heard of business people promoted and rewarded based on the stellar achievements of their organisations, without paying attention to the devastated lives left in their wakes.

At times the self-interest and manipulative intent is blatantly obvious – but experienced practitioners have mastered the art of concealing their duplicity from their intended victims. They present an aura of confidence which lulls their intended victims into a false sense of security – hence the label con-artist.

So how then do we differentiate between those who seek to influence us from those who wish to manipulate?

Not long after Aristotle, another teacher provided a different perspective on influence, and in particular influence which stands the test of time. In his “Sermon on the Mount” (see the book of Matthew, chapters 5-7), Jesus taught us to look not at short-term outcomes, but rather at the impact we have over a period of time:

16 You will know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes from thornbushes or figs from thistles? 17 Even so, every good tree bears good fruit, but a bad tree bears bad fruit. 18 A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, nor can a bad tree bear good fruit. 19 Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. 20 Therefore by their fruits you will know them. (Matthew 7:16-20)

When we look to others, we should evaluate not just what they say and do in the moment, but by the evidence that follows their lives over time.

As leaders, it is essential that we examine the fruit we produce over time, the impact we have on the lives of the people entrusted to our care. Are we sowing seeds of division or peace? Hatred or harmony? Destruction or empowerment?

Central to the concept of influence equity is the understanding that real influence comes from a deep interest in people, and leaving them better than we found them. Servant leadership (and influence) is first and foremost about developing others, not pursuing self-interest or our own agendas.

Fortunately, we have the choice to decide which seeds we’re going to sow. We can change the environment into which we sow that seed, and we can change the way we nurture and cultivate the fruit we will leave behind. In the next article we explore how we can do so.

Photo by Jassy Onyae on Unsplash

Solskjær: Leadership makes a difference

Sir Alex Ferguson and Ole Gunnar Solskjaer

In sport, as in life, many factors combine to impact performance. One of the critical factors is the role of the leader, the person who sets the tone, the culture, and an expectation of what should happen.

How clearly we see this in the arrival of Ole Gunnar Solskjær (b. 1973) as caretaker coach at Manchester United in December 2018. Working with the same squad of players, the former United striker has transformed a struggling team into winners. His record of eight wins from his first eight matches surpasses even that of his mentor, Sir Alex Ferguson, who started with a defeat and draw before clinching his first win.

The Back Story

It was Sir Alex who brought Solskjær to Old Trafford at the start of the 1996/97 season, and the Norwegian would represent the club 235 times over a 12-year period, scoring 91 goals and winning six premierships. The so-called ‘Baby-faced Assasin’ was also capped 67 times for his country.
When injury ended his playing career in 2007, Solskjær served United as a coach, ambassador and reserve team manager until 2011. He then managed Norwegian club Molde (for whom he had played before joining United) and Cardiff City, before answering the call to return to Old Trafford for as caretaker/manager for the remainder of the 2018/19 season.

This followed the sacking of José Mourinho, ‘the Special One’, whose time at United proved not to have been that special. Following Ferguson retirement in 2013, United struggled to find the right leadership. David Moyes won the Community Shield in his first match in charge, but lasted only 10 months before being sacked (iconic player Ryan Giggs took charge for the last four matches of the 2013/14 season). The United Board then appointed the highly renowned Louis van Gaal as manager, but in two years he could only deliver one FA Cup trophy, and he made way for the outspoken former Chelsea manager, José Mourinho.

United seemed to be making progress under Mourinho, winning more matches and trophies than Moyes and van Gaal combined (Community Shield, League Cup, and Europa League Cup), and achieving the highest EPL finish since the glory days of United. And yet …

The Not-So-Special One

Mourinho was a surprising choice for United. While he had achieved considerable success in England and elsewhere in Europe, he was never a particularly pleasant person to to deal with. He was often detached and morose, and did not appear to be particularly interested in others – players, staff and external stakeholders, including the media. His unpredictability, sense of self-importance and his defensive tactics (totally different to the traditional flamboyance of earlier United sides) proved very unpopular with fans and decision-makers alike.

The start of the 2018/19 season proved to be United’s worst opening in 28 years (the season in which Ferguson was one match away from being fired). Rumours ran rampant that Mourinho had ‘lost the dressing room’, i.e. the respect and support of his senior players, and in particular the mercurial Frenchman, Paul Pogba. He publicly criticised the Board (who had just extended his contract to 2020) for not supporting him in the transfer market, and behaved as though he was bigger than the club. And then he left star players on the bench in vital matches.
A 1-3 defeat against arch rivals Liverpool was the last straw, and on 18 December 2018 Manchester United’s chairman, Ed Woodward, announced that Mourinho would leave the club with immediate effect.

Ironically, Mourinho’s win record was only marginally below that of Sir Alex. His 84 from 244 represented a 58% win ratio, whereas Ferguson boasted 59%. But when leaders lose the confidence and trust of their followers and supporters, there is no come back.

The Arrival of Solskjær

Within a day of Mourinho’s departure, the Club announced former player Ole Gunnar Solskjær as the caretaker manager until the end of the season. Unlike Moyes, van Gaal and Mourinho, Solskjær was a United man. He was part of the 1999 Treble side, an extremely popular figure because of the many crucial goals he scored, often after coming on as a substitute. He had coached and worked with the United staff, and served as a patron of the Manchester United Supporters Trust.

Making the announcement, Executive Vice Chairman Ed Woodward recognised Solskjær’s ties to Old Trafford: “Ole is a club legend with huge experience, both on the pitch and in coaching roles. His history at Manchester United means he lives and breathes the culture here and everyone at the club is delighted to have him and Mike Phelan* back. We are confident they will unite the players and the fans as we head into the second half of the season.”

* Mike Phelan was Assistant Manager under Ferguson, until David Moyes replaced the entire coaching staff.

While it is still early days, the change in leadership has invigorated the players and brought hope to the supporters. As Reserve coach Solskjær had won four trophies – but more importantly, he had the respect of his players who wanted to perform for him. In the senior team that same sense of optimism seems to have taken hold.

United won their first eight matches in a row, and a spirited fight-back from 0-2 down to draw against Burnley in the final eight minutes of the ninth match give fans hope that Manchester United will once again return to their free-scoring approach to matches and their winning ways.

Same players, new leadership, new attitude. Leadership makes the difference.

Palatine Simulations

Posted by | Category: Product, Seminars | Comments: 0 Comments

The Palatine Group has delivered high-end business simulations to organisations such as NASA, BAE Systems and General Electric for over 15 years. As a partner of the Valense Network, Act Knowledge has access to its leading edge simulations, including:

Participants group into small management teams and learn strategies for continuous development through a combination of rapid team learning techniques, interactive presentations, group discussions, self-reflection, feedback exercises and personal coaching. These interventions expose them to all the major issues faced by project managers and project leaders in their daily work — balancing cost, schedule, quality, while interfacing with stakeholders and managing crisis events.